Parkinsn's Email List Message
Posting to the Parkinsn List is a benefit of Subscription
Re: Don Reed on ESCR and Joan of Arc
P-I-E-N-O News Discussion and Search
| Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.10 | Site Hosting donated by He.net
& Grant from The Parkinson Alliance |
Greg, I will forward all Don's posts to you if you want. Diane Wysak sends me from 30-50 or 60 posts per day and Don's is a regular. If I cut and paste more thatn 500 lines (whatever that is) PIEN rejects it., maybe the reason she can't post to the List. She sends me a wide variety of views pro and con, like LifeNews.com another regular is a Cstholic anti sten cell research site.
Don has a very conversational style and links something else to the ESCR message. I left out the pizza connection to Brownback on the last one because I didn't think it would make the cut. His son Roman is a paraplegic due to an accident , his sister has cancer and he has lost another sister to cancer.
If anyone wants to follow the Hwang scandal, political situaton in various states, research, posts opposed to ESCR, let me know and I will try to accommodate your interest or position. I did get a URL once which I copied and pasted but Rick couldn't get it.
I make mistakes. I can no longer type 100 wpm no errors I can't do as good a job as Murray did, but I know both Diane and I would like to try to get the word out. I can do little else. Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Wasson" <gregm94610@xxxxxxxxx> To: <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 7:19 AM Subject: Re: Don Reed on ESCR and Joan of Arc
Ray,
Thnks for giving us Don Reed's moving account of his own faith and the story of Joan of Arc. Don is a true hero in the stem cell wars. Aj and I have sat beside him and and his son Roman many times to testify for escr in the California legislature. He is always humble, his testimony moving and from the heart. The courage that both he and his son have shown in remarkable. Please continue to let us know his thoughts on the battle's in CA and elsewhere.
Greg Wasson Louisville, KY
ps - is it my settings, or is the online listserve not being maintained - I go to the pien site and the last post is from october.
--- rayilynlee <rayilynlee@xxxxxxx> wrote:
55 Wednesday, December 28, 2005 - JOAN OF ARC, AND STEM CELL RESEARCH
A noted bioethicist, a minister, recently asked me to put together my "problems with conservative religion"-why I do not trust them with the future of stem cell research.
I have been remiss on answering his request: partly because the subject is vast and very sensitive, but mainly because of my natural aversion to work.
But I will try.
A couple disclaimers:
First, I believe in God. One small nightmarish example, foolish even, but real to me: I had a dream in which my son's body was lying on a football field. He was wearing shoulder pads, everything, full football gear. But his head was several feet away. His head was upright on the grass, and it spoke to me: "I'm all right," he said repeatedly.
I woke, shaking, sobbing in the moonlight, while Gloria also woke, and comforted me.
A few weeks later, my son was paralyzed on the football field. Was I being given a warning from above? I have no idea. But I do believe in God, as the source of all.
Second, if I pick on Catholics and Protestants more than other faiths, it is because they are my own. My family is Catholic; I was raised Protestant. I do not imply other religions are superior, merely that my ignorance about them is more pronounced.
As to which religion I most "like", I would have to say Deism, the faith of America's Founding Fathers. Jefferson, Washington (also Lincoln, later on) were Deists. Deism basically said, God created the world, and after that, He observes, and we have free will-so everything is up to us; we cannot blame Anybody Upstairs for what goes wrong.
Deism, having no official organization, was not attractive to those who like to use religion as a power structure, in which they can rise, grow rich, and dominate.
The only mark Deism left was an invisible one: the Constitutional separation of church and state.
Which was very wise.
Because some religions say they speak with the voice of God-- and therefore cannot be wrong-- and may not even be questioned.
Which seems to me like a modern-day version of the old Abbott and Costello baseball comedy routine, "Who's on first? What's on second?".
Me (to religious person): How do you know you are right?
Religious Person: God told me.
Me: How am I supposed to know what God told you?
Religious Person: Because I told you what God told me.
Me: But-
Religious Person: Are you questioning God?
Me: Um--
Religious Person: It is simple. Listen to me, and do what I tell you, which is what, after all, God told me to tell you.
Consider, instead, what happened to Joan of Arc.
Everyone knows the basic story, how a 12 year old girl had a religious vision, and angels told her to drive the English out of France, (which they militarily occupied) and the little girl said, "Okay."
And Joan from the province of Arc gathered an army, and went to war.
The funny thing was, she won. Battle after battle. Once, outside the famous walled city of Orleans, (from which New Orleans takes its name) the fight was not going well. Again and again, with great loss of life, the French soldiers were turned back by English defenders, firing crossbows from the safety of the walls. Finally, Joan herself was shot in the shoulder, and knocked off her horse. She lay on the ground, seeming dead.
Some of her soldiers, thinking the battle was lost, panicked and began to run.
But Joan woke, and looked around, and had herself lifted back on her horse. Her battle flag was put in her hands again, and her voice rang out across the field.
"When my flag touches the wall," she said, "We will take the city."
A few hours, Joan rode into Orleans.
The English hated her. An occupying army being defeated by a little girl? Even great Shakespeare behaved disgracefully; in one of his plays, he called her a prostitute.
When Joan was finally captured, the English wanted the French church to deal with her. They did not want her just dead, although that must be done; they wanted her discredited, so the people would not follow her example, and go back to being passive.
So the Church obligingly held a "trial". On one side were sixty of the best lawyers money could buy.
=== message truncated ===
"Willy Loman never made a lot of money. His name was never in the paper. He's not the finest character that ever lived. But he's a human being, and a terrible thing is happening to him. So attention must be paid...Attention, attention must finally be paid to such a person." - Arthur Miller - Death of a Salesman
---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
---------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn