Re: PD & Non PD - A Clarification

["Edith S. Love" <elove@xxxxxxx>]

Frankly, Marjorie, my intent is not to argue but to clarify whether my
request be to you, Bob or anyone else.  However, I don't know the
personalities on the LIST, and oftentimes I find that there are so many
signatures-some above, some below-closures are not always clear to me.

NOW, LET'S SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT.  MY DEEPEST, MOST HUMBLE APOLOGIES,
BOB.  I'LL STAND BY PATIENTLY AND IN CONTRITION WHILE I AM FLAILED WITH
CONDEMNATION.  I ACCEPT MY GUILT.

TO MARJORIE, MY SINCEREST THANKS FOR SETTING MY PC AND ME STRAIGHT(SEEMS I
CAN USE SOME ASSIST IN THE VISION DEPARTMENT, TOO).  MY APOLOGIES FOR NOT
DIRECTING MY COMMENTS TO YOU INITIALLY.  CERTAINLY, I CONTINUE TO LOOK
FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE WHICH I KNOW IS FORTHCOMING.

In the meantime, I would also request that since many of our communiques
are lengthy and continuous-from one member to another-that some separation
be indicated.  Under no circumstances would I wish to commit this faux pas
again.
I stand humbled as I enter the headdress of the sun!
Sincerely,
E
P. S.  You handle the keyboard most competently, and you express yourself
beautifully and in a most caring way.  My response was to comments written
for the LIST.  I would hope you would post your reply in kind. If that is
uncomfortable, my email address is above.  I hope that this exchange is
between new friends.  There is no malice intended here.


At 07:17 AM 10/8/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>EDITH,
>Okay, Lets please do have some Clarification PLEASE!!!!!!!!
>How do you take a statement I made to Bob Fink,
>""I'm
>afraid that I do trust everyone, including the US Government,
> >> until I find that I can't trust them anymore?"......  Under these
>conditions, mightn't you be too late?"
>and they proceed to argue with Bob about it.
>That is MY LINE!!!
>
>If you want to argue with me about it please do it off-line.
>
>
>just me,
>Marjorie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 09:46 PM 10/07/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>>Bob,
>>
>>Clarification, please.  Just some points that come to mind...
>>
>>IF "the price of freedom is eternal vigilance" how then can you say,>> "I'm
>>afraid that I do trust everyone, including the US Government,
>> >> until I find that I can't trust them anymore?"......  Under these
>>conditions, mightn't you be too late?
>
>