Re: Should we change our Identification Formula?

Parkinsn's Email List Message

Posting to the Parkinsn List is a benefit of Subscription

[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should we change our Identification Formula?

Subject: Re: Should we change our Identification Formula?
From: David Moreland <davelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 06:23:48 -0700
In-reply-to: <7b33304c.3618c339@aol.com>
Reply-to: Parkinson's Information Exchange <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Parkinson's Information Exchange <PARKINSN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

At 09:01 AM 10/5/98 EDT, you wrote:
I probaby don't expres it just right  but I think people know what I mean
when I write  David L. Moreland 55/10 Why complecate it.


>Most sense to us, is to use original formula.  There are so variations in
>diagnosing that it's get very confusing especially when some doctors say you
>have it ten years before you become syptomomatic.  As I say with my name,
it's
>not important to me.
>Gerry (Brig59/12)
>
>
May Mercy, peace,and love be yours in abubdance
(Jude 2)
David L. Moreland 55/10

Order Books from Amazon.com from this website

Prev by Message: Re: Mystery ailments near nuclear sites
Next by Message: Re: Sinemet CR
Previous by thread: Re: Should we change our Identification Formula?
Next by thread: Re: Should we change our Identification Formula?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

Parkinsn's List Subject Index

Parkinsn's List Thread Index

Parkinsn's Archive Treasures Doctors, students, patients and caregivers find current Parkinson's information such as the Algorithm, Caregivers Handbook, and talks by respected Movement Disorder Specialists.

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.10

Match Keywords

Keywords:

Site Hosting donated by He.net
&
Grant from The Parkinson Alliance