Re: congress adjourns without udall House vote WHAT TO DO

[bernardo klainberg <bernardo.jfk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:10 AM 9/30/96 +0000, you wrote:
>At 05:54 PM 9/29/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>The 104th Congress has adjourned without The Udall bill being voted on in the
>>House.  While it was unanimously passed in a vote in the Senate,
>>unfortunately, Congressman Tom Bliley Republican from Richmond, Virginia and
>>Congressman Michael Bilirakis Republican from Tampa/St. Pete, Florida along
>>with Newt Gingrich from Republican from Marietta, Georgia, did not
>>considerate it a priority and therefore did not schedule it for a vote.
>>   Had it been voted on in the House we feel confident that it would have
>>passed since we had the support of over 235 representatives.
>>But all our work on the Udall bill is NOT lost.  When Congress reconvenes in
>>January WE WILL BE THERE TOO, STRONGER THAN EVER!  Our work is not done till
>>the Udall bill gets passed!
>>
> =============

DEAR WILL AND OTHERS; PERHAPS  we shud all contact those 3, non caring cong.

who ignored the senate's action, and ask them politely (at first) their
reasons for

their callous behaviour, and advise them that we think of  them every night

as we do the RLS and shudder, vibrating shaking shuffle . (and post their
replies !)

  ciao
bernard k.