Re: magnetic fields

[Seth Ness <ness@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 29 Mar 1995, Robert Fink wrote:

>
> Seth:
>
> Indeed I do; I have read most of them.  They were done, mostly, in
> collaboration with a R. Sandyk (since 1988) and are all published in a
> journal called the International Journal of Neurosciences, which is
> edited by Dr. Sandyk.

i was wondering why they were all in the same journal.

 BTW, it is not "magnetic fields", it is
> "electromagnetic radiation" (very low levels), the same stuff that runs
> in high-tension electrical lines.  This research is not considered
> "mainstream" and it appears that the only journal which has accepted
> this work is Dr. Sandyk's journal.
> The older articles praise this approach for multiple sclerosis,
> Alzheimer's disease, and other conditions as well as PD.  Most of the
> articles are based on one or two patients ("case reports").  What I
> don't understand is why is it that, if EMF (electromagnetic radiation)
> is so good and so "non-invasive", why one would consider using an
> "invasive" technique such as pallidotomy?
>
so no one has done any trials with this? it would be nice if there was
more information. the case reports in the abstracts sound very nice.
is there any possibility at all that it can cause harm?


---

Seth L. Ness                         Ness Gadol Hayah Sham
ness@xxxxxxxxxxxx