Re: Private Posts, etc...

[Nancy Walker <nwalker@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Joyce.  Even if alot of the discussion is technical I get
something from it and eventually I might even understand the "technical
talk" enough to interact, or at least enough to have an intelligent
conversation with my Dad's doctor.

Nancy Walker

nwalker@xxxxxxxxxxx

>In a message dated 95-11-13 15:01:49 EST, you write:
>
>>This is not to say that others out there don't have something
>>to add, but rather several of us have taken a pro-active
>>stance on this issue, and are simply trying to keep the size
>>of the "working group" at an efficient level [however  -
>>comments, input, etc. are always welcomed and
>>encouraged, either as personal posts or global ones]. The
>>point to be made is that until definitive answers to the
>>question[s] have been obtained, global broadcast of
>>intermediate messages is not warranted in my opinion.
>
>Then again, if the "working group" keeps all correspondence private until
>definitive answers have been obtained it's going to be a bit difficult for
>anyone else to comment, isn't it?  Personally, I prefer to watch y'all
>struggle toward an answer--it makes me feel a part of the process, even
>though I am not contributing to the discussion.
>
>my $.02.
>
>manderwiz, also known as joyce and/or jessie
>
>